The CREFC conference took place as the  stock market was plummeting and interest rates were soaring to multi-year highs, which heightened the negative tone. The Federal Reserve raised policy rates this week by 75 basis points, the biggest one-day jump in 28 years, in a bid to cool surging inflation. The consumer price index rose to 8.6% year-over-year in May, led by spiraling housing and energy costs. The 10-year Treasury yield has increased nearly 200 basis points and topped 3.40% this week, its highest level since January 2011.

Although commercial property fundamentals remain healthy in most sectors, the worrisome economic news increases the likelihood of a recession in coming quarters and is likely to put the industry in a holding pattern. “It’s been a while since we last discussed stagflation,” said CREFC executive director Lisa Pendergast. “No doubt, rising rates will impact mortgage and cap rates negatively, and recession can have a deleterious effect on property-level cash flows.”

CMBS Spreads Jump

Lenders and borrowers have been hit with a double whammy. Not only are interest rates rising but risk spreads are widening, as well. For example, the spread of senior 10-year triple-A CMBS has increased by more than 80 basis points over the past year, with that class priced to yield 145 basis points over Treasuries in a deal issued this week. The combination of rising rates and higher-risk spreads increased the cost of mortgage debt by 200-250 basis points since the beginning of the year. That creates ripple effects throughout the industry, including:

• Acquisition yields have increased, which erodes pricing. Anecdotally, property values are down 10-15%, but the decline could extend further if the capital markets continue to erode.
• Transaction activity will plummet. “The market is going to slow while people digest what’s going on in the world,” said one CREFC panelist.
• Mortgage activity is dropping. “All-in rates have gone up so much so fast that borrowers are looking at the rate (offered) and saying, ‘No, thank you,’” said a CREFC panelist.
• The increase in rates has the biggest impact on securitization programs, because their origination quotes are directly tied to bond spreads. “Investors don’t want to be in a position where they buy a bond and the next day spreads are wider,” said a CREFC speaker.
• There will also be a deleterious effect on refinancing maturing loans that were originated when rates were lower. Borrowers may be refinancing with less leverage and higher rates, leading to an increase in defaults and/or maturity extensions.

Headed for a Downturn?

The new capital markets environment has even impacted government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which have raised rates and “are not as competitive as other capital sources,” according to multifamily loan executives.

Not every source of mortgage debt will be on the sidelines, though. Portfolio lenders do not have the same mark-to-market constraints and hedging risks of securitized lenders.

Many of the participants at the CREFC event—which hit an all-time-high attendance record of 1,424—forecast that market activity will slow dramatically at least through the end of the summer. Whether the dip extends beyond then will depend on how the economy performs in the second half of the year and the Fed’s ability to slow inflation without creating a sharp recession.

The post CRE Deal Flow Set to Tumble: CREFC appeared first on Yardi Matrix Blog.

More than $15 billion of self-storage properties traded in 2021, according to Yardi Matrix, more than double any previous year, while prices hit all-time highs. But the recent spike in interest rates is putting the market to the test. The 10-year Treasury rate, which often is used as a proxy for the “risk-free” rate to price transactions, has increased about 150 basis points since January. That has increased fixed mortgage rates commensurately. “In a short time, the cost of capital has spiked dramatically,” noted Tom Hughes, director at Harrison Street Capital.

Panelists at the event in Tarrytown, N.Y., said that the sector is well positioned to thrive in an inflationary environment because income comes from short-term leases and that customer demand is poised to grow because of lifestyle trends.

“There will be some softening of cap rates, but not as large as it should be given the increase in interest rates,” said Brandon Goetzman, a managing principal at the Blue Vista Equity Group. Goetzman was speaking as part of a NYSSA panel moderated by event organizer Nick Malagisi, a managing director at SVN Commercial Real Estate Advisors.

Banks are responding to the rising rates by reducing the amount of leverage they are willing to provide. NYSSA panelists said deals that featured 70% loan-to-value ratios are being lowered to 60% or 65%, with some transactions seeing high bidders drop out as a result. “Some deals are retraded because the winning bidders are not able to perform,” said Devin Huber, a founder of the BSC Group.

How much impact will the increase in financing costs have on acquisition yields? In order to maintain current pricing levels, investors will either have to cut already-thin premiums over the risk-free rate or underwrite continued large growth in rents.

Christian Sonne, an executive vice president at Newmark, said that in self storage the average transaction over the last quarter-century was priced to yield a 3.84% premium over the 10-year Treasury bond. More recently, as storage prices have climbed, investors’ premium has been 1.88%, about half the long-term rate, Sonne said. “I’ve never seen such compressed spreads,” he observed. “Folks are relying on appreciation, not cash flow.”

Yet many in the sector believe that cash flow will keep rising at above-trend levels and prices will remain firm in the face of rising rates. Self-storage rents increased by 10% in 2021, per Matrix, as demand skyrocketed due to demographic and lifestyle trends that were exacerbated by the pandemic.

“The pandemic has created structural growth in self-storage demand,” Sonne said. Investors “believe it is a haven against uncertainty and a hedge against inflation.”

Read the full analysis: NYSSA: Self Storage Prices to Hold Firm as Demand Rises

The post Self Storage Execs Bullish on Pricing Despite Rising Rates appeared first on Yardi Matrix Blog.

Few real estate topics generate as much debate. It’s a crucial question within the commercial property industry since there probably are more dollars committed to office buildings than any other property type. Outside the industry, it touches on the daily lives of many.

I’ve noticed a severe disconnect between the views of people within and outside the real estate industry. Property executives stress the benefits of in-person office work; how young people want to return to the office to make connections, collaborate and get mentored; how people are tired of Zoom meetings or working in their pajamas, etc.

Outside the industry, however, I don’t know many people who want to commute regularly and go back to the office unless they absolutely must. Everyone I’ve met whose jobs permanently change to mostly or fully remote are without exception happy.

Few young workers I’ve encountered think of their careers in terms of mentorship and long-term arcs. They’re mostly focused on their immediate work conditions and pay. For most of those raised in the Internet era, working on their laptops at home is a feature, not a bug. And given the shortage of skilled young workers and difficulty companies have preventing valuable employees from being poached, companies have no choice but to accommodate their desires while raising pay and benefits.

Why So Optimistic?

There could be many reasons why the CRE industry may be out of touch with my experience. One possibility is that my experience is not representative. Excluding that, my best guess is a “talking your book” phenomenon. Individuals whose business is selling commercial space naturally want to promote the benefits and necessity of office space.

Another explanation for excess exuberance could be that the pessimistic scenario is disheartening. A sharp drop in demand for offices creates many negative implications for the industry. Much easier to believe that things will work out with minimal disruption.

The nature of our jobs might also play a role. Meeting in person and collaborating with teams is more valuable in finance and real estate than other office-using tasks such as data entry or computer programming. The property industry’s view of the office work experience likely differs from the views of those in other office-using industries.

One thing the CRE industry gets right is that offices are still necessary. The office market is facing a period of painful disruption, but what exactly that entails remains to be seen. Today, onboarding generally involves grafting a few remote newcomers onto a functioning team. Will that be as efficient in five or seven or 10 years, when entire teams are remote and have never been together in person?

Also, much of the leverage for remote work today is on the side of workers, who can demand terms because of the labor shortage. The dynamic changes, though, if the economy slows, unemployment rises, and the leverage turns to the employers’ side. Under that scenario, how many corporations will demand more in-person attendance?

More Questions Than Answers

In the end, my forecast for office space involves a lot more questions than answers. It’s an easy call to say that demand for offices will decline. Many companies have space they aren’t using, and that will prompt cutbacks when leases expire in coming years. That will be offset to some degree by overall growth in office employment and large firms maintaining premier office spaces to attract talent.

Still, demand over time is likely to be negative relative to pre-pandemic levels. Office buildings that aren’t properly amenitized or in bad locations will likely lose tenants and be converted to other uses. Early indications are that rents will level off and office landlords will be forced to reinvent space and spend a lot on tenant improvements.

Beyond that, office work will continue to evolve.

Read the full analysis: The Future of Office: Is CRE Out of Touch?

The post Returning to the Office: Is That the Future? appeared first on Yardi Matrix Blog.

Commercial property values and loan origination volumes are reaching all-time peaks as investors flock to the sector. The Mortgage Bankers Association forecasts that commercial and multifamily borrowing will break $1 trillion for the first time in 2022, up 13% from estimated 2021 volume of $900 billion.

Meanwhile, CBRE’s lending index of debt market conditions rose 10.3% in the fourth quarter and is 42% above pre-pandemic levels, a sign that lending activity and liquidity are strong and credit spreads are tight. At the same time, CBRE reported that metrics that gauge loan quality such as the average loan-to-value (LTV) and debt-service coverage ratio (DSCR) were roughly the same as they were in 2018.

CBRE found that the average LTV of loans originated in 4Q21 was 63.4%, down slightly from 64.0% in 4Q20 and 65.3% in 4Q18. The average DSCR was 1.48 in 4Q21, which means that net property income was almost 50% more than the average loan payment. The 4Q21 DSCR was up slightly from 1.47 in 4Q20 and 1.42 in 4Q18.

Loan quality is boosted in part because of market conditions such as low interest rates and thinning yields, or capitalization rates, that investors are willing to accept to own properties. The average cap rate in CBRE’s loan universe was 5.1% in 4Q21, down 4 basis points from the year-earlier period and 77 basis points below cap rates in 4Q18. Lower cap rates increase property values and reduce borrower LTVs.

Meanwhile, low interest rates in recent years and tighter credit spreads have contributed to historically low loan coupons, which means borrowers can take out more debt with lower monthly payments than they could in the past. The average coupon in CBRE’s loan universe dropped to 3.3% in 4Q21, unchanged from 4Q20 but well below the 4.7% average in 4Q18.

Just over one-quarter (26%) of loans originated in 4Q21 had coupons of less than 3.0%, and 70% had coupons between 3.0% and 4.0%. Larger loans—usually with better-capitalized borrowers—were more likely to have lower rates.

CBRE’s index highlighted the increasing market share of alternate lenders—including debt funds, pension funds and credit companies—which originated 37% of non-agency loans in the fourth quarter of 2021, more than any other category of lender. Banks had a 29.0% market share, followed by CMBS (18.5%) and life companies (14.8%).

Surviving Rising Rates

Heady capital conditions reflect the commercial property market’s strong fundamentals performance, high returns relative to fixed-income products, and reputation as an inflation hedge. Rents in some property sectors—such as multifamily, industrial and self-storage—rose in 2021 at decades-long highs. Meanwhile, commercial real estate has traditionally produced competitive returns during periods of high inflation at a time when rising prices are a main economic concern.

“Commercial real estate lending volumes are closely tied to the values of the underlying properties. In 2021 those values rose by more than 20%, and those increases will fuel further demand for mortgage debt in the coming years,” said Jamie Woodwell, MBA’s vice president for commercial real estate research.

There are looming issues, though, that should concern the market. The Federal Reserve is expected to increase policy rates between 100 and 200 basis points over the next 12 to 18 months, which likely will push the 10-year Treasury rate up significantly. The 10-year-Treasury yield topped 2% last week for the first time since July 2019 and is expected to keep rising.

Since loans and properties are priced off the Treasury risk-free rate, cap rates could rise over the next 12 to 24 months. Although there is not a one-to-one correlation between Treasury yields and cap rates, a sharp increase in interest rates would put pressure on property prices and increase the cost of borrowing. Rising loan coupons will especially hurt when today’s low-coupon loans mature and must be refinanced.

Moody’s Analytics Chief Economist Mark Zandi said last week during a webinar sponsored by the Counselors of Real Estate trade group that commercial real estate prices would flatten as interest rates rise, while some property segments such as gateway offices face “game-changer” complications such as work-from-home that could reduce occupier demand. “Commercial real estate is a good hedge, but there is no way to get away from the reality of work-from-home and higher cap rates,” he said.

The good news is that loans underwritten in the current cycle are much better prepared to handle stressed market conditions than was the case before the global financial crisis. One loan analyst noted that when loans originated in the 2005-07 period were analyzed using stressed scenarios (such as higher interest rates and an economic recession), more than a quarter had stressed LTVs of more than 100%, and nearly half had stressed LTVs of at least 90%. Using the same stressed standards, much fewer loans originated in recent years fail the tests.

“What matters in all this is a loan’s ability to refinance under stressed scenarios,” the analyst said. “There is more risk in a rising rate environment, more debt per square foot is a concern, but (conditions) haven’t deteriorated to pre-financial crisis levels.”

Said Woodwell: “Continued increases in property incomes, and stability in the ways investors value those incomes, should also support solid demand for mortgage capital, even in the face of modest increases in interest rates.”  

The post Loan Quality Stable as Volume Rises appeared first on Yardi Matrix Blog.

Construction employment rose in 231, or 65%, of 358 metro areas in 2021. The Houston metro added the most construction jobs (8,800 jobs, up 4%), followed by Chicago (6,500 jobs, up 5%) and Los Angeles (6,300 jobs, up 4%).

Sioux Falls, S.D., had the highest percentage gain (24%, 2,100 jobs). Among larger metros, the biggest percentage gains were achieved in the Midwest: St. Louis (9%, 5,700 jobs) and Milwaukee (9% 2,500 jobs) topped the list, while Cincinnati, Cleveland and Pittsburgh were all up 8%. Construction employment declined from a year earlier in 76 metros and was flat in 51.

Long Island, N.Y., lost the most jobs (-5,700, or -7%), followed by New York City (-4,200 jobs, or -3%) and Baltimore (-3,800 jobs, or -5%). The largest percentage declines were in Evansville, Ind.-Kentucky (-18%, or -1,700 jobs) and Napa, Calif. (-15%, or -600 jobs). Seven areas set all-time lows for December, while 57 metros reached new December highs for construction jobs.

Twenty-six states remain below the pre-pandemic construction employment levels of February 2020, with losers led by New York (-42,000 jobs, or -10%), Texas (-30,200, -3.9%) and California (-22,300, -2.4%), according to the AGC. Louisiana had the largest percentage loss (-13%, -17,200 jobs), followed by Wyoming (-11%, -2,500) and New York.

New York and California have been affected by pandemic restrictions, and California and Texas have lost some jobs due to weather events over the last 22 months. Construction activity in Texas and Louisiana has also been hit hard by the steep downturn in oil and gas activity, onshore and offshore, said Ken Simonson, the AGC’s chief economist.

Since the pandemic started, Utah has added the most jobs (10,000, 8.8%), followed by Washington (8,200, 3.7%) and North Carolina (7,900, 3.4%). South Dakota added the highest percentage (10%, 2,500 jobs), followed by Utah and Idaho (8.2%, 4,500). In February, construction employment reached a record high in Massachusetts, Utah, Washington and the District of Columbia.

Labor Shortage

Job openings in construction totaled 273,000 at the end of December, an increase of 62,000, or nearly 30%, from December 2020, according to the government’s latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. That figure exceeded the 220,000 employees that construction firms were able to hire in December, implying firms would have added more than twice as many workers if they had been able to fill all openings, Simonson said.

“Construction employment topped year-earlier levels in almost two-thirds of metros for the past few months,” he said. “But contractors in many areas say they would have hired even more workers if qualified candidates were available.”

The growing number of construction job openings is a clear sign that labor shortages are getting worse. AGC executives noted that the association’s recently released 2022 Construction Hiring and Business Outlook found that 83% of contractors report having a hard time finding qualified workers to hire. They urged Congress and the Biden administration to boost funding for career and technical education to help recruit and prepare more people for high-paying construction careers.

“For every dollar the federal government currently invests in career and technical education, it spends six urging students to attend college and work in an office,” said Stephen Sandherr, the association’s chief executive officer. “Narrowing that funding gap will help more people understand that there are multiple paths to success.”

The post Construction Employment Recovering, but Still Short Workers appeared first on Yardi Matrix Blog.

Panelists at the National Multifamily Housing Council’s Annual Meeting in Orlando last week predicted a deceleration in the heady growth rates achieved in 2021 for the economy and the multifamily segment. Nonetheless, experts expect the strong fundamentals performance will continue, driven by robust economic growth, healthy consumer balance sheets, pent-up demand from the pandemic and the long-term shortage of housing.

Multifamily is coming off a year with the highest asking rent increases ever, due to extremely strong demand that lifted occupancy rates near all-time highs. Although growth is expected to moderate in 2022, the industry does face challenges that include rising interest rates, a national labor shortage, evolving migration patterns, and changes in renter preferences.

Economic Growth with Headwinds

Richard Barkham, global chief economist & global head of research for CBRE, said he expects GDP to increase by 4% to 4.5% in 2022, driven by robust spending by consumers and businesses. However, he said inflation will remain high before settling down into the 2.5% to 3% range. The fear of an inflationary spiral is prompting the Federal Reserve to increase policy rates and sell off some of its bond holdings.

Barkham said the increase in interest rates “is a sign of success, a sign of recovery in the economy.” However, he said there are headwinds that include inflation, rising rates, the labor shortage that has driven wage growth, and a potential economic slowdown in China and emerging markets.

Barkham said that the decline in immigration in recent years means that the U.S. will have 2 million fewer workers than was projected in the past. “If trends continue, the U.S. labor force will shrink for the first time in generations,” he said, noting that the drop would put a crimp in future economic growth. The tight labor market has produced 20-year-high wage growth, with the average wage rising about 5% in 2021.

Sustained Rent Growth

Rising wages have played a role in the apartment market, providing households with the ability to pay for the 13.5% increase in U.S. apartment asking rents in 2021, according to Yardi Matrix data. A big part of rising rents is the rent growth in luxury apartments. Rents for luxury Lifestyle units in the U.S. rose by 15.9% in 2021, compared to 11.0% growth for Renter-by-Necessity units, per Matrix. Renters have more to spend on housing for many reasons, including government stimulus, higher wages, and increased savings during the pandemic.

Another factor in rent growth is the migration of renters to secondary and tertiary markets that was exacerbated during the pandemic. Renters that moved to less expensive markets were able to pay more for rent because it was relatively cheap compared to the higher-rent markets they moved from. Because of the wave of population growth, asking rents in 2021 rose by 20% or more in many markets in the Sun Belt and Southwest, despite large increases in apartment deliveries in those metros.

Migration is closely related to trends in work-from-home. Return to offices has been delayed as new variants of COVID-19 continue to emerge, disrupting corporate plans and making it difficult to develop permanent policies. Yardi Matrix vice president Jeff Adler said it will take another couple of years before workplace issues shake out.

Adler said the pandemic exacerbated existing migration trends. He said population will continue to shift from urban to suburban submarkets within the same metro and from high-cost gateway markets to secondary and tertiary markets with a lower cost of living and appealing lifestyle amenities. As people continue to seek urban-style amenities such as restaurants and entertainment, secondary metros and outer-ring suburbs are developing “urbanized nodes” that appeal to renters, he said.

Speaking on a different panel, John Affleck, senior vice president at John Burns Real Estate Consulting, agreed. “What we’re seeing today is a strategic location change from people who realize they are not going back to the office anytime soon,” he said.

The growth outside of gateway markets is having a huge impact on investment strategies. Ned Striker, senior managing partner of investments and capital markets at Cortland, said that over the last decade institutional investors have become more comfortable with secondary and tertiary markets that they would have avoided in the past because they were too small and illiquid.

Read the full analysis: Multifamily Demand Remains Strong

The post What’s in Store for Multifamily in 2022 appeared first on Yardi Matrix Blog.

By metro, however, the differences are stark. Asking rents during that time increased by 20% or more in nine of the top 30 and 10% or more in 19 of the top 30. Meanwhile, in only four metros—large coastal centers San Jose, San Francisco and New York, and Midland, Texas—were current asking rents below pre-pandemic levels.

Two years ago, few could have imagined that COVID-19 would still be impacting daily lives or that it if did, apartment rents would be in a good spot. However, as we start 2022, multifamily rents are coming off record-breaking highs in 2021 with an optimistic outlook for the year ahead.

Looking at the universe of 147 metros tracked by Yardi Matrix, asking rents increased by 20% or more in just over one in five (29) and by 10% or more in almost three quarters (79). The only metros that remain below pre-pandemic asking rent levels are in the Bay Area (San Francisco and San Jose), New York City and Midland/Odessa, Texas, where rents are down by 22.5%.

Migration Shifts

The changes in rent since the pandemic started reveal much about demand and where growth could be concentrated going forward. Sheltering in place and working from home have loosened the link between home and work and limited the cultural advantages of large cities. That led to a migration from high-cost coastal centers starting in the spring of 2020. Where households are going can be seen by rent growth data.

The top choices are the South and Southwest. These secondary and tertiary markets feature a lower cost of living than gateway metros, attractive weather and geography, and a growing base of jobs as corporations expand there.

Another type of migration occurred between expensive coastal markets and nearby secondary markets that are less expensive. In this type of migration, people move further from job centers but within occasional commuting distance for flexible jobs. Or they are willing to make longer commutes in exchange for larger or less expensive apartments.

An Enduring Trend?

Where this all goes is unpredictable. As demonstrated by the onset of the Omicron wave, forecasting the end of the pandemic is difficult. New waves of the virus may impact corporate policies regarding remote work—more are delaying going back to the office or even implementing permanent fully remote policies. That could continue to drive migration away from large job centers.

In-migration continues to be a big factor. Fewer people moved to urban centers during the pandemic, even as more moved out. Post-pandemic, immigration could pick up and make up for households moving out. if the pandemic continues to affect commerce and travel, future migration will remain unpredictable. Clearly, however, the growth in metros in the South and West is not likely to abate.

Read the full analysis: Pandemic Rent Growth Highlights Migration Patterns

The post The Pandemic’s Impact on Concentrations in Rent Growth appeared first on Yardi Matrix Blog.

Not necessarily. Worries about inflation are typically couched in terms of whether it will spiral out of control and prompt the Federal Reserve to act to reduce growth that leads to a recession. That happened in the 1970s and early 1980s, but there are important differences between the economy of that era and today that are likely to mitigate the likelihood of “stagflation.”

In any event, high inflation might not be a big problem for commercial real estate. A recent study by Greg MacKinnon, research director of the Pension Real Estate Association, found that commercial real estate performance has been good during periods of high inflation and that returns are much more closely correlated to growth than inflation.

“The lesson for today’s real estate investors trying to interpret what the macroeconomic environment means for real estate is that overall economic strength is much more important than whether inflation may rise or fall going forward,” the paper said. Or as MacKinnon put it in a recent webinar: “If the economy is doing well, real estate will do well, no matter what happens with inflation. Inflation is not critical in itself for commercial real estate.”

GDP, Inflation Highest in Decades

U.S. GDP is projected to top 5.0% for the year, the first time it would reach that level since 1984, when it was 7.2%. Inflation growth reached 6.8% year-over-year in November, the fastest rate since January 1982, and has been above 5% for the last six months.

The spikes in growth and inflation have been caused by a culmination of events started by the pandemic, the unprecedented halt to parts of the economy and the extraordinary amount of monetary and fiscal stimulus provided by the federal government. While few expect inflation to recede to the Fed’s target level soon, the prognosis and severity are debated. Optimists say that inflation will gradually ease.

Others say inflation may not be so quick to recede. One reason is the rapid growth in housing costs—reflected in the 13.7% growth in U.S. multifamily asking rents year-over-year through November, according to Yardi Matrix—which comprise nearly one-third of the CPI.

Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell and other Biden administration officials downplayed the potential of long-term inflation for most of the year, dubbing it “transitory.” However, more recently they stopped using that word, and they are now talking about unwinding the Fed’s $9 trillion balance sheet. While Federal Reserve executives are not commenting on raising the fed funds rate, most observers expect rates to increase starting in 2022 (earlier than previously expected).

Are ‘70s Comparisons Overblown?

Since there is consensus that inflation will remain above trend through 2023 or later, the debate is centered around how bad that is for the economy and whether it sets off a spiral of negative events.

Inflation has been very low for a long time, so a short period of running hot isn’t likely to do any permanent damage. But rising wages and materials costs could prompt companies to raise prices to maintain profits, and if consumers feel pressure and lose confidence, they could stop spending.

If inflation does spiral, it could prompt the Federal Reserve to raise rates sharply and throw the economy into a recession, which happened during the last period of sustained inflation in the 1970s and 1980s. There are good reasons to think that the 1970s comparisons are overblown. For one thing, price hikes today remain well below levels in the 1970s and ‘80s, when inflation reached as high as 14.8% in 1980.

Another dissimilarity is that the economy has generally been strong for years, with interest rates and unemployment steadily declining over the past decade (other than the pandemic). The 1970s inflation had multiple drivers, but the main one was the sharp spike in oil and gas prices. Domestic oil production has grown dramatically, and the U.S. is not at the mercy of foreign producers as it was in the 1970s. What’s more, the U.S. economy is more diverse and resilient than it was in the period leading up to stagflation.

Is CRE a Hedge Against Inflation?

Commercial real estate is commonly believed to serve as a hedge against inflation, because rents and values tend to rise in an inflationary environment. To test the theory about inflation, the PREA study looked at total returns of properties in the NCREIF Property Index, which comprises core properties owned by institutional managers. The study calculated returns between 1978 and 2020 through periods of low, medium and high GDP and inflation growth. The study found that returns were the highest in periods of high growth and low inflation, but that growth was a much more relevant factor to performance than inflation.

The evidence seems to indicate that high inflation over time is a lesser problem for commercial real estate than low growth. Even so, it is appropriate that policymakers adjust policy sooner rather than later to prevent negative impact to consumer and business confidence. And the real estate industry should not be sanguine about the potential for havoc that inflation could create and should instead plan accordingly.

Read the full analysis: Inflation Fears and Commercial Real Estate

The post Is Inflation a Problem for Commercial Real Estate? appeared first on Yardi Matrix Blog.

The panel—which included Moody’s Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi, American Action Forum president Douglas Holtz-Eakin and Douglas Elmendorf, dean & professor of public policy at the Harvard Kennedy School—agreed that the infrastructure portion of the bill would spur growth. However, there was some disagreement as to whether the bill would push labor participation higher and whether it would have negative budgetary implications.

The package consists of two components. The first is the $1 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act that was passed and signed into law by President Joe Biden. The act focuses on “hard” infrastructure, including roads, bridges, airports and transportation, ports, water systems, rural broadband and electric vehicle charging stations.

The second component, the $1.75 trillion Build Back Better Act (BBB), is still being debated in Congress. BBB would focus on social spending, including $400 billion for expanded childcare, child tax credits and home care for seniors, and $550 billion for environmental measures to fight climate change.

Assuming BBB is also signed into law, Zandi said that the acts would add 0.9% to GDP growth over the next two years and enable the economy to return to full employment growth by early 2023. But he said the long-term impact on growth would be “small in the grand scheme of things.”

Regarding budget implications, Zandi also said that the law would largely be paid for on a static basis and would pay for itself entirely when factoring in the additional growth. The benefits of the plan would entirely go to low- and middle-income households, he said, adding, “The bottom line is, I think this is a good piece of legislation.”

Holtz-Eakin, former director of the Congressional Budget Office under President George H. W. Bush, said that the Infrastructure Act already passed will have a positive impact on the economy, but he expressed concerns about some parts of the BBB bill.

Holtz-Eakin questioned the wisdom of the government adding stimulus to the economy at a time when demand is already strong and inflation is at a decades-long high, in part because it comes on the heels of upwards of $4 trillion of COVID-19 relief distributed in 2020 and 2021. He also expressed doubt about whether the BBB would achieve its intended purpose of adding workers to the labor pool.

One of the main purposes of the social spending in the BBB act is to help workers who have dropped out of the workforce because they must care for a child or parent or can’t afford childcare to get back into the labor pool. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the labor force participation rate dropped from 63.4% in January 2020 to 60.8% in May 2020, when the pandemic forced sheltering at home. Labor participation since has risen to 61.6% as of October but remains far below the 30-year average.

Holtz-Eakin said that the childcare provisions of BBB amounted to a “risky bet.” He said the payments were too generous and would create “a recipe for expensive childcare” and noted that California had increased its childcare benefits only to see labor participation drop. “Having a childcare subsidy is one thing; how to execute it is another,” he said.

Zandi said that although there were reasonable concerns about the implementation of the program, he expected that BBB would result in higher labor force participation and higher productivity growth. Elmendorf, also a former CBO director under President Barack Obama, said that the positive social impacts of the BBB were more important than the economic effect.

Elmendorf noted that there is a long body of evidence that demonstrates that support for low-income families and children has positive long-term impacts on the productivity of children from those households. “That should make us bullish about child-focused investments,” he said.

Addressing another area of contention surrounding the bills, the panel was sanguine about the infrastructure bills’ impact on inflation. Elmendorf noted that the $2.25 trillion in spending in the bills was spread out over 10 years in which the U.S. economy was expected to total $300 trillion. The spending “is not large relative to the economy,” he said. Zandi agreed. “I don’t see it as meaningful,” he said of the impact on inflation.

The post NABE Panel Debates Infrastructure Package appeared first on Yardi Matrix Blog.

Industry trade groups gave a thumbs up to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which is seen as a long-overdue investment that will provide a boost for the economy and the industry. The act will invest in roads and bridges, water infrastructure, climate resilience and internet.

“Any time you invest in roads, bridges, airplanes, trains and boats, you’re investing in real estate,” said Mike Flood, a senior vice president of commercial/multifamily policy at the Mortgage Bankers Association. “We all want safe and efficient ways to get from where we live to where we work, play and shop.”

An analysis of the plans by Moody’s Analytics said that if both the infrastructure and the Build Back Better (BBB) acts were passed, it would increase real GDP growth by about one percentage point in 2022 and 2023 and create the addition of several hundred thousand jobs annually between 2022 and 2026, peaking at about 2.4 million jobs by the middle of the decade. After that, the impact of the bill on the economy would fade, though GDP and employment would still be permanently higher after 10 years under the BBB framework. If both bills become law, Moody’s said long-term economic growth would be strengthened, especially for lower- and middle-income Americans.

Objections to the $1.75 billion social spending bill center around the total amount of spending and concerns about adding to the federal deficit. Moody’s, however, said that although the legislation would add more than $450 billion to the federal deficit between 2022 and 2026, in the ensuing five years the deficit would be reduced by nearly $250 billion.

“The legislation is more-or-less paid for on a static basis and more than paid for on a dynamic basis through higher taxes on multinational corporations and the well-to-do and a range of several other pay-fors,” Moody’s chief economist Mark Zandi and assistant director Bernard Yaros wrote.

Yaros said the items funded by the bill have benefits for commercial properties. “Public investments in surface, water and air transportation will likely spur more warehousing construction in and around ports, airports and other regional trade hubs,” he said. “In addition, public transit investments would boost the attractiveness of nearby office real estate in the eyes of investors. Finally, in the $1.75 trillion social spending bill, green energy tax credits may incent greater investments in energy efficiency in CRE properties.”

Infrastructure a Boost for CRE

Industry trade groups expressed a thumbs up for the bills. “Infrastructure is a vital concern to the success of commercial and multifamily real estate,” said Lisa Pendergast, executive director of the CRE Finance Council. “CREFC welcomes these investments in transportation, water, energy, broadband and climate resilience, all of which are critical to the short-, medium- and long-term success of these assets and the communities where they are located.”

Now the Biden administration and Democrats in Congress are negotiating final details of the BBB act that would invest an additional $1.75 trillion in items that include social spending and action on climate change and green energy. A vote on BBB could come as early as next week.

For a full analysis, see: CRE Applauds $1.5T Infrastructure Plan

The post Infrastructure Act Draws Praise From CRE Industry appeared first on Yardi Matrix Blog.